Grantmakers › Wisconsin

Natural Resources Foundation of Wisconsi

Madison, WI · EIN 39-1572034. Reported 102 grants totalling $3,806,690 to 50 organizations across tax years 2021-2025, on Form 990 Schedule I.

Does this grantmaker accept applications?

Its tax return does not say, and we will not guess. Private foundations file Form 990-PF, which asks outright whether they fund only organizations they select themselves -- 78% say yes, and that one answer is what lets the rest of this site tell you which foundations are worth approaching. Grantmaking charities like this one file a regular Form 990 instead, and the IRS never puts the question to them. Anyone claiming to know the answer from the filing is inventing it.

Three things in the filing do bear on it:

1. What kind of organization it is. The IRS has no activity classification on file for this one, so we cannot tell you whether it is a community foundation or a single-institution support fund. The recipient list below is the better guide.
2. How spread out its giving is. 50 distinct organizations, with 47% of the dollars going to the largest single recipient. That is concentrated. Most of the money has a settled destination, and the remainder is what is realistically in play.
3. How much its list changes. 58% of one year's grantees are funded again the next, across 4 year-to-year transitions. That is about the 56% median for grantmaking charities -- lower than the 67% median for private foundations. It describes the organizations it already funds, not whether it would consider a new one.

How big are its grants?

The median reported grant is $10,000. Half of what it reported fell between $7,500 and $22,380; the smallest was $5,114 and the largest $706,078. If you are asking for materially more than the top of that range, you are asking the wrong organization.

Every organization it funded

This is the complete list from its filings, largest first. Recipients are grouped by the EIN the filer reported, not by name, so an organization that was typed differently in two years appears once rather than twice.

30 of 50 (60%) received money in more than one year over the 5 years we hold. Remember the $5,000 floor: an organization funded every year at $3,000 shows up here as never funded at all.

What the money was for

Taken verbatim from the purpose column of its filings, largest first. This is the closest thing to a statement of what it funds, in its own words.

• Dnr - Natural Heritage Conservation $306,711 · 2024
  TO SUPPORT THE RESTORATION, MANAGEMENT, AND CONSERVATION OF VARIOUS STATE NATURAL AREAS.
• Dnr - Wildlife Management $98,440 · 2025
  TO SUPPORT, RESTORE, MAINTAIN, AND ENHANCE VARIOUS WISCONSIN STATE AREAS.
• Dnr - Parks & Recreation $62,900 · 2024
  TO SUPPORT THE CAMPGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE, RESTORATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF WISCONSIN STATE PARKS.
• Dnr - Havenwoods State Forest $46,000 · 2024
  TO SUPPORT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING, AND ENHANCING VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT MILWAUKEE'S HAVENWOODS STATE FOREST.
• Cornell Lab of Ornithology $40,500 · 2022
  NEOTROPICAL FLYWAYS PROJECT
• Landmark Conservancy $34,494 · 2024
  TO SUPPORT LANDMARK CONSERVANCY WITH THE CONSERVATION OF LOVE LAKE AND AQUISITION/EXPANSION OF PUBLIC LANDS HELD UNDER CONSERVATION EASEMENT IN NORTHEAST WISCONSIN.

What kind of organizations it funds

By the activity category the IRS assigns each recipient, for the 31 of 50 recipients we could match to a registered organization. The categories are the IRS's, not ours -- Schedule I reports the recipient's EIN, so this is a lookup rather than a name match.

Giving by year

Tax years, not calendar years, and the most recent year is usually incomplete -- Form 990 arrives about a year after the year it covers, so a low final year means late paperwork rather than a grantmaker winding down.

Where its money goes

96% of its giving went to organizations in Wisconsin. Community foundations and federated funds are usually the most geographically bounded funders there are -- being outside the footprint is normally disqualifying in a way that a weak programme fit is not.

Down to the city

Funders that support the same organizations

These grantmakers and private foundations gave to organizations this one also funded. Shared grantees are a sign of overlapping priorities and nothing more: they do not show that any of these funders would consider a new organization. Each page says what its filings show.

How to approach this grantmaker

1. Look for a published programme first. Unlike most private foundations, organizations of this kind often do run open, deadlined grant cycles with written guidelines. Its own website is the authority on that; this page is the authority on who it has actually paid.
2. Check you are its size. The median reported grant is $10,000 -- and because grants under $5,000 need not be reported, it very likely writes smaller cheques than this page can see.
3. Check you are in its geography. Its giving concentrates in Wisconsin.
4. Read the recipient list for organizations like yours. If nothing on it resembles your work, that is a real answer and a cheap one to get.

Where these numbers come from

Everything above is taken from Natural Resources Foundation of Wisconsi's own Form 990 Schedule I filings, which the IRS publishes in bulk. We used 5 returns (tax years 2021-2025). Grant figures are from its returns. Recipient classifications, the concentration and retention figures and the funders that support the same organizations are our own calculations from them, described in how we build this.

On its most recent return it told the IRS it made grants to 23 section 501(c)(3) organizations and 3 other organizations. That is the filer's own count for one year; the totals above cover every year we hold.

Address of record on the latest return: 211 South Paterson Street 100, Madison, WI, 53703.

EIN 39-1572034 · See the original filings on ProPublica · How we build this

Is something here wrong about your organization? Email hello@funderscope.com and we will correct it.