Grantmakers › California

Climate Imperative Foundation

San Francisco, CA · EIN 84-5024713. Reported 350 grants totalling $513.4M to 162 organizations across tax years 2021-2024, on Form 990 Schedule I.

Does this grantmaker accept applications?

Its tax return does not say, and we will not guess. Private foundations file Form 990-PF, which asks outright whether they fund only organizations they select themselves -- 78% say yes, and that one answer is what lets the rest of this site tell you which foundations are worth approaching. Grantmaking charities like this one file a regular Form 990 instead, and the IRS never puts the question to them. Anyone claiming to know the answer from the filing is inventing it.

Three things in the filing do bear on it:

1. What kind of organization it is. For Climate Imperative Foundation, by its IRS classification it raises and distributes funds for environment (NTEE C12).
2. How spread out its giving is. 162 distinct organizations, with 19% of the dollars going to the largest single recipient. That is genuinely spread out -- the mark of a funder making many independent decisions rather than underwriting one institution.
3. How much its list changes. 68% of one year's grantees are funded again the next, across 3 year-to-year transitions. That is about the 57% median for grantmaking charities -- noticeably lower than the 67% private foundations manage. Organizations like this one rotate more of their list each year, which is where an opening for a newcomer tends to be.

How big are its grants?

The median reported grant is $475,088. Half of what it reported fell between $230,000 and $1,000,000; the smallest was $13,000 and the largest $29.8M. If you are asking for materially more than the top of that range, you are asking the wrong organization.

Every organization it funded

This is the complete list from its filings, largest first. Recipients are grouped by the EIN the filer reported, not by name, so an organization that was typed differently in two years appears once rather than twice.

97 of 162 (60%) received money in more than one year over the 4 years we hold. Remember the $5,000 floor: an organization funded every year at $3,000 shows up here as never funded at all.

What the money was for

Taken verbatim from the purpose column of its filings, largest first. This is the closest thing to a statement of what it funds, in its own words.

• The Energy Foundation $27.0M · 2023
  To support analysis and education about clean and healthy transportation policies
• Sierra Club Foundation $25.6M · 2023
  To support research, education and outreach about clean and healthy homes
• United States Energy Foundation $19.6M · 2023
  To support research, education, and outreach about clean and healthy homes
• Sierra Club Foundation Fbo Sierra Club California $13.3M · 2022
  TO SUPPORT RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND OUTREACH ABOUT TRANSITIONING FROM COAL TO CLEAN ENERGY, TRANSITIONING FROM FOSSIL FUELS TO CLEAN ENERGY AND CLEAN AND HEALTHY HOMES
• Natural Resources Defense Council $7,439,000 · 2023
  To support research, education, and technical support on clean industrial practices
• Natural Resources Defense Council Inc $5,764,000 · 2022
  TO SUPPORT RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND OUTREACH ABOUT THE EXPANSION OF US ENERGY SYSTEMS, CLEAN AND HEALTHY HOMES, A SAFE CLIMATE FUTURE, CLEAN INDUSTRIAL PRACTICES AND GREEN FINANCE

What kind of organizations it funds

By each recipient's own IRS classification, for the 138 of 162 recipients we could match to a registered organization. These are assigned categories, not our guesses -- Schedule I reports the recipient's EIN, so this is a lookup rather than a name match.

Giving by year

Tax years, not calendar years, and the most recent year is usually incomplete -- Form 990 arrives about a year after the year it covers, so a low final year means late paperwork rather than a grantmaker winding down.

Where its money goes

54% of its giving went to organizations in California. Community foundations and federated funds are usually the most geographically bounded funders there are -- being outside the footprint is normally disqualifying in a way that a weak programme fit is not.

Down to the city

Funders that support the same organizations

These grantmakers and private foundations gave to organizations this one also funded. Shared grantees are the strongest signal available that two funders have overlapping priorities -- and a funder already backing your peers is a far warmer prospect than one that merely lists your cause.

How to approach this grantmaker

1. Look for a published programme first. Unlike most private foundations, organizations of this kind often do run open, deadlined grant cycles with written guidelines. Its own website is the authority on that; this page is the authority on who it has actually paid.
2. Check you are its size. The median reported grant is $475,088 -- and because grants under $5,000 need not be reported, it very likely writes smaller cheques than this page can see.
3. Check you are in its geography. Its giving concentrates in California.
4. Read the recipient list for organizations like yours. If nothing on it resembles your work, that is a real answer and a cheap one to get.

Related guides

Where these numbers come from

Everything above is taken from Climate Imperative Foundation's own Form 990 Schedule I filings, which the IRS publishes in bulk. We used 4 returns (tax years 2021-2024). Nothing here is scraped, inferred or estimated.

On its most recent return it told the IRS it made grants to 93 section 501(c)(3) organizations and 3 other organizations. That is the filer's own count for one year; the totals above cover every year we hold.

Address of record on the latest return: 98 Battery Street 202, San Francisco, CA, 94111.

EIN 84-5024713 · See the original filings on ProPublica · How we build this

Is something here wrong about your organization? Email hello@funderscope.com and we will correct it.